Opportunity and Challenges in Integrating Technology in English Grammar Instruction

EFL Teachers' Perceptions

Authors

  • Darbaz R. Abdalla Ministry of Education, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Salah B. Hussein Department of English Language, College of Basic Education, University of Raparin, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26750/5xxhxe54

Keywords:

English Grammar Instruction, Digital Learning Tools, Educational Technology in Kurdistan, Teacher and Student Challenges, Effectiveness of Technology.

Abstract

      This article offers an understanding of technology integration in teaching English grammar in educational settings where English is taught as a foreign language in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq KRI. Traditional Grammar instruction requires students to memorise rules and practice repetitive drills. This approach makes students unable to use grammatical rules in real-life scenarios. Nevertheless, some new digital technologies are taking a different route and introducing more interactive, engaging, and flexible approaches. The purpose of this study is to examine the usability of these technologies, identify the challenges faced by teachers and students, and recommend feasible solutions to enhance the use of technology in teaching grammar.

The study population consists of 25 university instructors from various private and public institutions in KRI. Using semi-structured interviews, the researcher collected statistical data and personal perspectives on the use of technology in grammar instruction. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed. Qualitative coding frameworks were used to extract meaningful patterns and insights. Responses were coded and classified using Excel to identify key themes related to the impact, obstacles, and instructional adaptations associated with technology. However, the research revealed a nuanced implication: teachers are eager but under-supported, students are motivated but unevenly resourced, and institutions are ambitious but inconsistently equipped.

References

Abdullah, B.M.A., 2015. KURDISH STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS TOWARD COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING AT A UNIVERSITY IN KURDISTAN REGION IRAQ. European Scientific Journal.

Abdullah, Z.H.A., 2020. The Impacts of Social Media on Kurdish EFL Students' English Language Proficiency. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 27(5), pp.89-105. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.27.5.2020.23

Abdulazeez, D., Razwan, M.S. and Alves, G.R., 2020. A Framework for Enhancing Higher Education in The Kurdistan Region of Iraq through A Dedicated Digital Education Mooc. The Journal of The University of Duhok, 23(1), pp.81-93.

Abdullayeva, M., 2024. METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS IN TEACHING GRAMMAR OF SCHOOL PUPILS. Science and Innovation, 3(Special Issue 19), pp.801-809. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10827387

Aisyiyah, S., Novawan, A., Dewangga, V. and Bunarkaheni, S., 2024. Teaching grammar by using technologies: Unlocking language pedagogical potential. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 10(1), pp.36-45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25047/jeapco.v10i1.4615

Ahmed, A. and Ariannejad, A., 2025. An Empirical Study of Digital Literacy among Iraqi Kurdish EFL Teachers. Applied Research on English Language. DOI: 10.22108/are.2024.143139.2380

Ahmed, S.A., Othman, B.J., Gardi, B., Sabir, B.Y., Ismael, N.B., Hamza, P.A., Sorguli, S., Aziz, H.M., Ali, B.J. and Anwar, G., 2021. Students’ attitudes towards learning English in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences (IJELS), 6(3), pp.72–85. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijels.63.11

Al Bataineh, K.B., Banikalef, A.E.A.A. and Albashtawi, A.H., 2019. The Effect of Blended Learning on EFL Students' Grammar Performance and Attitudes: An Investigation of Moodle. Arab World English Journal, 10(1), pp.324-334. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.27

Ali, M.M., Mahmood, M.A., Anjum, M.A.I. and Shahid, A., 2020. The acceptance of mobile assisted language learning as primary learning tool for learners in COVID 19 situations. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(12), pp.382-398.

Ali, S.S. and Mohammadzadeh, B., 2022. Iraqi Kurdish EFL teachers’ beliefs about technological pedagogical and content knowledge: The role of teacher experience and education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, p.969195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.969195

Azeez, P.Z. and Al Bajalani, F.R., 2018. Effects of mobile assisted language learning on developing Kurdish EFL students: Listening sub skills at Koya University. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), pp.85-95.

Bahrani, T., Sim, T.S. and Nekoueizadeh, M., 2014. Second language acquisition in informal setting. Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS), 4(8). doi:10.4304/tpls.4.8.1714-1723

Bikowski, D., 2018. Using technology to teach English. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Press. DOI: 10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0441

Blake, R.J., 2013. Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown University Press.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp.77-101.

Canale, M. and Swain, M., 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), pp.1-47.

Chapelle, C.A., 2006. English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.7.02the

Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K., 2018. Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Cutter, M., 2023. Differentiated instruction in the EFL classroom: An interview study on Hungarian primary and secondary school EFL teachers' views and self-reported practices. Journal Name, 53(3), pp.28–35. doi:10.1556/2059.2023.00076

Dooly, M. and Sadler, R., 2016. Becoming little scientists: Technologically-enhanced project-based language learning. Available at: http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2016/doolysadler.pdf

Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N. and Hyun, H., 2006. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education.

Godwin-Jones, R., 2010. Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), pp.2–11. Available at: http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num2/emerging.pdf

Godwin-Jones, R., 2011. Autonomous language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), pp.4–11. Available at: http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2011/emerging.pdf

Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L., 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), pp.59-82. http://www.sagepublications.com

Hymes, D.H., 1972. On communicative competence. In: Pride, J.B. and Holmes, J. (eds.) Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp.269–293. Available at: https://wwwhomes.unibielefeld.de/sgramley/Hymes-2.pdf

Kessler, G., 2018. Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), pp.205–218. DOI: 10.1111/flan.12318

Krashen, S.D., 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S.D., 1985. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G., 1988. Criteria for Assessing Naturalistic Inquiries as Reports.

Marleni, M., 2020. Enhancing the students’ writing skill through technological writing feature of Wridea. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(1), pp.140-153.

Mohamad, F., 2009. Internet-based grammar instruction in the ESL classroom. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(2), pp.34-48. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.5.2.34

Nawe, P.A.M. and Amin, W.O., 2020. The impact of integrating technology in teaching listening skill to Kurdish students at preparatory schools. Qalaai Zanist Journal, 5(3), pp.811-838. https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.5.3.32

Nawsha, X., 2024. AI tools in grammar learning in Kurdistan. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, 28(3), pp.321–333. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.3.19

Omar, A.W., 2022. Integrating emerging technologies in EFL grammar teaching.

Robinson, P., 1995. Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45(2), pp.283-331.

Rossiter, A., 2021. The Importance of Grammar. Online Submission. https://linguapress.com/grammar/importance-of-grammar.htm

Sarsanbay, K., 2008. Ways of using modern technologies at lessons on the basis of English grammar.

Summerhays, K., 2024. Adaptive System of English-Speaking Learning Based on Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Language and Educational Research, 5(2), pp.87–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.52783/jes.2637

Van Le, H.H. and Doan, T.K.O., 2023, March. EFL students' perceptions of using Nearpod in online English learning. In ICTE Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3, pp. 98-117). https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.2338

Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.

Yakar, U., Sülü, A., Porgalı, M. and Çalış, N., 2020. From constructivist educational technology to mobile constructivism: How mobile learning serves constructivism. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 6(1), pp.56-75. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijare

Zana, H.M., 2024. Blended learning effects on grammar performance among Kurdish students. Journal of Language Studies, 8(7), pp.164–186. https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.8.7.10

Zheen, H.A., 2020. The role of social media in EFL grammar and vocabulary development. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 27(5), pp.89–105. http://www.jtuh.tu.edu.iq

Published

2025-10-29

Issue

Section

Humanities & Social Sciences

How to Cite

Opportunity and Challenges in Integrating Technology in English Grammar Instruction: EFL Teachers’ Perceptions. (2025). Journal of University of Raparin, 12(5), 1103-1125. https://doi.org/10.26750/5xxhxe54