Kurdish EFL Teachers' Perceptions of Implementing Student-Centered Approach in EFL Classes

Authors

  • Shawbo Othman Hamad Department of English Language, College of Basic Education, University of Raparin, Ranya, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Jamal Ali Omer Department of English Language, College of Basic Education, University of Raparin, Ranya, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26750/e1h8hq25

Abstract

One of the main challenges teachers face in EFL (English as a Foreign Language) settings is implementing a student-centered approach (SCA), especially in Kurdish EFL classrooms. This study aims to explore Kurdish EFL teachers' perceptions of the SCA, focusing on its benefits, challenges, and strategies for adoption. The research employs both quantitative and qualitative methods to gather and analyze data. The participants include 100 Kurdish EFL teachers from various public universities in the Kurdistan region, all of whom have experience with implementing a student-centered approach in their classrooms. Data collection involved questionnaires distributed to 52 male and 48 female EFL teachers to assess their perceptions of SCA, along with semi-structured interviews to gain deeper insights into their challenges. The questions aimed to understand teachers’ familiarity with SCA, their experiences, and perceived barriers to effective implementation. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for the quantitative data, while thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative interview data. The results of the study indicate that while Kurdish EFL teachers recognize the potential benefits of a student-centered approach, such as improving student engagement and fostering independent learning, they also face significant challenges. These include a lack of resources, insufficient training, cultural resistance, and difficulties in classroom management. Teachers reported struggles in finding appropriate methods, adjusting lesson pacing, and conducting aligned assessments.

References

Al-Ansari, H., 2020. Blended learning as a coping strategy for large university EFL classes in Kuwait. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 33(4), pp.341–362.

Abdul-Haqq, I. (2005) Communicative language teaching in Egyptian public schools. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.

Ahmed, R., Mahmood, S. & Hussein, D. (2023) 'EFL reform in Kurdistan: A decade of change', International Journal of Middle Eastern Education, 12(3), pp. 112-130.

Al-Hoorie, A.H. (2017) 'Sixty years of language motivation research', Language Teaching, 50(1), pp. 1-18.

Al-Hoorie, A. and Alkhalil, A., 2022. Overcrowding and pedagogy: Saudi university teachers’ voices. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(2), pp.201–217.

Al-Subahi, A. (2010). Educational reform in Saudi Arabia: Implementation challenges. Riyadh: King Saud University Publications.

Amin, L. & Barzani, S. (2023) 'Cultural scaffolding in Kurdish EFL classrooms', TESOL Quarterly, 57(1), pp. 89-112.

Borg, S. (2019). Teacher cognition and language education. London: Bloomsbury.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) 'Using thematic analysis in psychology', Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77-101.

Çelik, S. and Aksel, A., 2021. “Forty is the magic number”: Large-class narratives of Turkish EFL instructors. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 12(1), pp.107–119.

Dam, L. (1995) Autonomy in language learning: Danish classroom practices. Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.

Hashemi, M. and Abbasi, M., 2020. Spoon-feeding syndrome in Iranian EFL education: A phenomenological study. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(2), pp.69–84.

Hassan, P., Najat, R. & Karim, S. (2024) 'Task-based learning in three Erbil universities: A longitudinal study', Kurdish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), pp. 78-95.

Hussein, D. (2022). Generational pedagogy: A study of 300 early-career EFL instructors in Kurdistan. Erbil: Salahaddin University Press.

Johnson, R.B. & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004) 'Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come', Educational Researcher, 33(7), pp. 14-26.

KRG MOHE (2023). Annual report on quality assurance in higher education. Erbil: Kurdistan Regional Government Ministry of Higher Education.

KRG Ministry of Education (2022). National framework for teacher professional development. Erbil: KRG Press.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Mahmood, K. & Najat, R. (2023) 'Community-based language learning in Kurdistan', Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 22(3), pp. 155-170.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton.

Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T.S. (2014) Approaches and methods in language teaching. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sadeghi, K. and Richards, J., 2022. Exam washback in Iranian pre-university EFL classrooms: A mixed-methods study. Language Testing in Asia, 12, Article 9.

Şahan, Ö. (2021) 'Hybrid pedagogy in Middle Eastern EFL contexts', TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), pp. 891-917.

Şallı-Çopur, D. (2015) 'Teacher implementation of student-centered approaches in Turkish EFL classrooms', MEXTESOL Journal, 39(2), pp. 1-15.

Shaaban, K. and Ghaith, G., 2021. Structured cooperative roles in large Lebanese university EFL classes. TESOL Journal, 12(4), e607.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Published

2026-06-20

Issue

Section

Humanities & Social Sciences

How to Cite

Kurdish EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Implementing Student-Centered Approach in EFL Classes. (2026). Raparin Journal of Humanities (RJH), 13(2), 937-959. https://doi.org/10.26750/e1h8hq25