Intertextual Context in Kurdish Political Discourse, with Reference to Referendum Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(11).No(2).Paper27Keywords:
Discourse, Critical Discourse Analysis, Interpretation, Intertextual Context, Referendum Discourse .Abstract
This study is entitled "Intertextual Context in Kurdish Political Discourse, with Reference to Referendum Discourse". Intertextual context is Norman Fairclough’s perspective in critical discourse analysis which is concerned with explaining the sources of discourse production. It highlights what these sources are and where they relate to other texts. This subject is at the second level of critical discourse analysis which is known as discourse interpretation level. It is a significant part which aims at reaching the common knowledge sources of discourse participants via interpreting the intertextual context of a given discourse. The aim is to achieve a common interpretation, for, in this regard; any discourse or linguistic act is in a deep relationship with some other texts. The current study is an attempt to interpret and to a large extent identify the sources of the referendum discourse (the whole face to face speeches of Massoud Barzani, Chairman of the High Council for Referendum). This study employs the descriptive analysis method. It, first, presents Fairclough’s view on intertextual context. Then, the depicted examples of this are presented in the referendum discourse.
References
روث فوداك، ميشيل ماير، 2014، مناهج التحليل النقدي، ترجمة: حسام أحمد فرج، عزة شبل محمد، الطبعة الاولى، المركز القومي للترجمة، القاهرة.
نورمان فيركلف، 2015، الخطاب والتغير الاجتماعي، ترجمة: محمج عنانى، الطبعة الاولى، المركز القومي للترجمة، القاهرة.
نورمان فيركلف، 2016، اللغة والسلطة، ترجمة: محمد عنانى، الطبعة الاولى، المركز القومي للترجمة، القاهرة.
دان سبيربر، ديدري ولسون، 2016، نظرية الصلة أو المناسبة، ترجمة: هشام أبراهيم عبدالله، الطبعة الاولى، دار الكتاب الجديد المتحدة.
Fairclough, N. 1989: Language and power, London, Longman.
Fairclough, N.1992: Discourse and Social Change. 1st Edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Flowerdew, J., Richardson, J. E. 2018: The Handbook Of Critical Discourse Studies, London and New York: Rotledge.
Foucault, M. 1972: The Archaeology of knowledge, London: Tavistock publications.
Kristeva, J. 1986: The Kristeva reader, Edited by: Moi, T., New York: Colombia University Press.
Trask, R. L. 1997: A Student's Dictionary of Language and Linguistic
Van Dijk, T. 2012: Structures of Discourse and Structures of Power, In Anderson, J. A. (ed.), Communication yearbook 12, Routledge.وتاری شاری ئاکرێ، 13/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx72Fl6g8zM
وتاری شاری زاخۆ ، 14/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKYW8wpiHHs
وتاری شاری ئامێدی، 15/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYMpcGltUGE
وتاری شاری دهۆک، 16/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t32sV-FuDQ
وتاری شاری سۆران، 19/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKX458w3goc
وتاری شاری سلێمانی، 20/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUBWlAc6UdU
وتاری شاری هەولێر، 22/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUBWlAc6UdU
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of University of Raparin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.