Role-Playing, Witty Language, and Woman’s Agency in Oliver Goldsmith’s She Stoops to Conquer.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26750/Keywords:
Stoops, Satire, Test, Generation, Fortune, AgencyAbstract
Oliver Goldsmith’s She Stoops to Conquer has been widely considered by critics as one of the most significant comedies in England’s 18th Century. Its popularity is due to the dramatist’s cunning use of satire and humour as artistic means of entertainment. Noticeably, critics mostly have focused on the aesthetic values of the dramatist’s use of satire and humour. However, this research provides a new reading, particularly the significance of the heroine’s bodily and linguistic role-playing. Firstly, the research investigates the extent the heroine’s role-playing enables the male protagonist to undergo personality change from a reserved and anti-social into a more tolerant and open-minded personality. Secondly, the research investigates the extent the heroine’s witty rhetoric, together with her role-playing, exposes patriarchal misconceptions, biases, and prejudices about women and marriage by the authoritarian figures. Notably, the easiness through which the heroine changes identities and social roles, symbolically, throws into question the fixability and naturalness of social roles in the play. Symbolically, the heroine’s performative acts of role-playing , whether bodily or linguistically, confirms postmodern feminist’s theory, particularly Third -Wave Feminism , with regard to constructiveness and performativity of gender and identity. Methodologically, the research applies Close- reading approach; that is, New Criticism, as well as Feminist approach. Moreover, the research is significant because it investigates the co-relation between the heroine’s role-playing and her quest for selfhood.
References
Ann, Elizabeth (1994) Liberty, Equality, Sorority : The Origins and Interpretation of American Feminist Thought. Carlson Pub.
Arab, Ronda. (2011). Manly Mechanicals on the Early Modern English Stage ·Susquehanna University Press. P.17.
Bailey , Joanne.(2003)· Marriage and Marriage Breakdown in England, 1660–1800. Cambridge University Press. P.143
Clark , Anna Scandal. (2013). The Sexual Politics of the British Constitution. Princeton University Press · P.13
Clark, Lorna J. (2007 ). A Celebration of Frances Burney. Cambridge Scholars Pub. P.126
Cordner, Michael. (2008). Oxford English Drama: She Stoops to Conquer and Other Comedies. UK: Oxford University Press. P.108-111 , 133-136, 164-167)).
Dupre, Louis. (2008). The Enlightenment and the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Culture. Yale University Press. P.151
Jordan, Elle. (2002).The Women's Movement and Women's Employment in Nineteenth Century Britain. Taylor & Francis. P.25
Lepore, Ernest , Ernie Lepore. , And , Luvell Anderson. (2024) .The Oxford Handbook of Applied Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press
Maclaran , Pauline. And, Lorna Stevens, Miriam Catterall. (2013). Marketing and Feminism: Current Issues and Research. Taylor & Francis. P.4
Maxwell, Nicholas. (2019). Science and Enlightenment. Two Great Problems of Learning.
McCord , Louisa Susanna Cheves. (1995). Political and Social Essays. University Press of Virginia·
McKendry , Anne. Medieval Crime Fiction. (2019). A Critical Overview. McFarland, Incorporated, Publishers. P. 126
Nayar, Pramod K. (2010 ). Contemporary Literary And Cultural Theory: From Structuralism To Ecocriticism . Pearson Education India. P.91,
Ossowska, Maria . (2016). Social Determinants of Moral Schlaeger · University of Pennsylvania Press, Incorporated.P.46
Perrot, Georges Duby, Michelle. (1992). A History of Women in the West: Renaissance and Enlightenment paradoxes. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press·
Rutherford, Alexandra . And, Wade Pickren. (2010). A History of Modern Psychology in Context. Wiley·
Schlaeger, Jürgen. (1999). Representations of Emotions. Jürgen Schlaeger G. Narr · P.100, P.101
Smith, Michael K. (2013). Playing Fast and Loose: Match Wits with the Author and Guess the Origin of Common Idioms. Author House· Springer International Publishing · P.17
Sunderland, Jane .And , Lia Litosseliti.(2002). Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. John Benjamins Pub.P.26
Swindells, Julia. And , David Francis Taylor. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of the Georgian Theatre 1737-1832. OUP Oxford. P.361
Tague, Ingrid H. (2002). Women of Quality: Accepting and Contesting Ideals of Femininity in England, 1690-1760. Boydell Press.P.37
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of University of Raparin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.