A Relevance Theory Analysis of Joe Biden's Interview on ABC’s Late-Night Talk Show
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(10).No(4).Paper25Keywords:
Relevance Theory, Biden, Inference, Cognitive Context.Abstract
This research aims to conduct a relevance-theoretic analysis of an interview with American President Joe Biden on ABC's late-night talk show. Relevance Theory was developed by Sperber and Wilson (1986/1995) as an inference-based framework for understanding the cognitive interpretation of language. The model posits that in any given circumstance, the recipient must consider what others say relevant. The recipient must consider what others say is as relevant in any given circumstance. The descriptive-qualitative approach was used to illustrate how Biden constructs his sentences to provide the listener with sufficient evidence to grasp his intended meaning and how the listener employs comprehension strategies to understand the speaker's underlying meaning. Therefore, the research first reveals that Biden conveys his communicative goals clearly and gives enough supporting evidence for the receiver to deduce some of his intentions. Second, for effective communication, both parties must share cognitive context.
References
Adams, Sally, and Hicks, Wynford (2009) Interviewing for Journalists. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Allott, Nicholas (2013) Relevance Theory. In A. Capone, F. Lo Piparo & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics, 57–98. Berlin/Newyork: Springer.
Andersen, Gisle (2001) Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. John Benjamins B.V.
Andersen, Gisle (2015) Relevance. In K. Aijmer and Ch. Rühlemann(eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook,143-148. Marburg, Germany. : Cambridge University Press.
Andersen, Peter (1999) Nonverbal Communication: Forms and Functions. Mountain View(California): Mayfield.
Assimakopoulos, Starvos (2008) Intention, Common Ground, and The Availability of Semantic Content: A Relevance-theoretic Perspective, in I. Kecskes, and J.Mey (Eds), Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, 105-126. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Austin, Paddy (1987)The Dark Side of Politeness: A pragmatic Analysis of Non-corporative Communication. PhD. Dissertation. The University of Cantebury.
Bai, Limie and Chen, Juanjuan (2010) On Pragmatic Inference and Metaphor from the Perspective of Relevance Theory. Journal of Cambridge Studies.5:1-45. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg .
Blakemore, Diane (2002) Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blakemore, Diane (1992) Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Blackwell: Oxford.
Borg, Emma (2004) Minimal Semantics. England: Oxford University Press.
Borjesson, Kirsten (2014) The Semantics-Pragmatics Controversy. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
Braseth, Jane-fredrick (2010) Relevance Theory and the Problem of Content Sharing. MA thesis, Universitetet I Oslo.
Carston, Robyn (2001) "Explicature and Semantics." In S. Davis and B. Gillon (eds.) Semantics: A Reader, 1-44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carston, Robyn (2002) Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Carston, Robyn (2004) Relevance Theory and The Saying/Implicating Distinction in L.Horn and G. Ward(Eds), Handbook of Pragmatics, 633–656. Blackwell.
Cruse, Alan .2006. A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
Cruz, Manual (2016) Three Decades of Relevance Theory. in M. Padilla Cruz (ed.), Relevance Theory. Recent Developments, Current Challenges, and Future Directions,1-29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Davies, Martin (1987) Relevance and Mutual knowledge. In Behavioural and Brain Sciences,10,716-717.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fasold, Ralph (1990) The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fetzer, Anita 2000) Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews. Revue. Vol. 20, No. 4: 415-460.
Feng, Guangwu (2010) A Theory of Conventional Implicature and Pragmatic Markers in Chinese. UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Furnish, Patricia (2015) Context Matters: Pragmatics and Political Discourse analysis of Presidential Speeches of Michelle Bachelet, Barack Obama, and Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero. MA Thesis. The University of North Carolina.
Gaspar, Teresa (2016) Scalar Implicatures: A Gricean vs. a Relevance Theory Approach. English Studies,11-23. Department of English and German Philology and Translation and Interpreting.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Peter Todd and the ABC Research Group (1999) Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grundy, Peter (2008) Doing Pragmatics. London: Hodder Education.
Hakim, Hussein (2017) Indirectness in Selected Political Interviews: A Pragmatic Analysis.MA Study. University of Al-Qadisiyah.
Jackson.Rebbecca-Claire (2016)The Pragmatics Of Repetition, Emphasis, and Intensification. PhD. Dissertation. Salford, UK.
Kasmirli, Maria (2016) Conversational Implicature: Re-Assessing The Gricean Framework. PhD. Dissertation. The University of Sheffield.
Lauerbach, Gerda and Fetzer, Anita (2007) Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives. In G. Lauerbach and A. Fetzer (Eds.), Political discourse in the media: Cross-cultural perspectives, 3-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts (2008) Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behavior. In D. Bousfield, and M. Locher (eds). Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 77-99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Loukusa, Soile (2007) Use of Context in Pragmatic Language Comprehension by Children with Asperger Syndrom or High-Functioning Autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 37 (6): 1049-59, Jul.
Marquez,Maria (2000) An Inferential Mode of Communication. Philologica canariensia,.Nº 6-7, 139-58.
Matsui, Tomoko (2000) Bridging and Relevance. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Michael, Haugh (2002) The Intuitive Basis of Implicature: Relevance Theoretic Implicitness versus Gricean Implying. International Pragmatics Association,12:2.117-134.
Moeschler, Jacques (2007) The Role of Explicature in Communication and Intercultural Communication. I. Kecskes and L.Horn(Eds.), In Explorations in Pragmatics. Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, 73-94. Berlin. New York. Mouton de Gruyter.
Müller, Misha. (2016) Plausible Deniability From Gricean Pragmatics to the Insights of Relevance Theory.MA Study. Neuchatel University.
Murtisari, Elisabeth (2013) A Relevance-based Framework for Explicitation and Implication in Translation: An Alternative Typology. trans-kom 6 [2] 315-344.
Özercan, Alydar (2016) The Maxims of Relevance Theory for Determining The Referent of a Proper Name. Thesis. The Graduate School of Social Sciences Of Middle East Technical University.
Recanati, Francois (1989) The Pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language, 4,294-328.
Recanati, Francois (1993) Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford. Blackwell.
Richards, Christine (1985) Inferential Pragmatics and the Literary Text. Journal of Pragmatics 9,261-285.
Romero, Esther, and Soria, Belen (2014) Relevance Theory and Metaphor. Ling. (dis)curso 14 (3)
Sandová, Jana (2010) Speaker's involvement in political interviews. Unpublished MA thesis, Masarykova.
Schröder, K. and Perna, C.(2006) Reading and Processing a Journalistic Text Through Relevance Theory: the Larry Rohter case. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem , V. 4, n. 6.
Sinclair, Melinda and Winckler, Walter (1991) Relevance Theory: Explicating Verbal Communication. (http://spilplus.journals.ac.za/).
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre (1987) Precis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Behavioural and Brain Sciences(1987)10,697-754. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. (1st ed). Oxford: Backwell Publisher.
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre (1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. (2nd ed)Oxford: Backwell Publisher.
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre (1982) Mutual knowledge and Relevance in Theories of Comprehension. In N.V. Smith, ed., Mutual knowledge, 61-85. London: Academic Press.
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre (2008) Relevance Theory. L Horn, and G.Ward (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. (Vol.26) 607-632. John Wiley and Sons.
Sperber,Dan (1994) “Understanding verbal understanding.” In J. Khalfa (ed.), What is Intelligence, 179–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toews, Nicholas (2019) Relevance Theory and Proverbs: Exploring Context Through Explicatures and Implicatures.MA Study. Faculty of Graduate Studies Trinity Western University.
Unger, Christoph (2006) Genre, Relevance, and Global Coherence. The Pragmatics of Discourse Type. (eBook). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan (2012) Meaning and Relevance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan (2002b) 'Truthfulness and Relevance. Mind,111(443), 583–632.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan (2002a) Relevance Theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 249-290.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan (1981) On Grice's Theory of Conversation. In P. Werth (ed.), Conversation and Discourse,155-178. London: Croom Helm.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan (1994) Outline of Relevance Theory. Links & Letters, [online], N. 1, 85-106.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan (1987) Outline of Relevance Theory. Notes on Linguistics 39:5-24.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan (1991) Pragmatics and Modularity. In S.Davis(Eds.), Pragmatics: A Reader,583-595. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan (2004) Relevance Theory. In L.Horn and G.Ward(Eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics,607-632.Blackwell Publishing. USA.
Wilson , Deirdre and Sperber, Dan (1986) Sobre La Definicirn De Relevancia. In L. Valdrs(Eds.) La bt~squeda del significado, 583-598. Madrid: Tecnos.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan (1993) Linguistic Form and Relevance. Lingua 90: 1-25.
Wilson, Deirdre (2003) Relevance and Lexical Pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics,15, 273-292.
Wilson, Deirdre (2010) Relevance Theory. In L. Cummings (Ed.), The pragmatics encyclopedia,393–399. London: Routledge.
Wilson, Deirdre (2011) Parallels And Differences in The Treatment of Metaphor 1in Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics.Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis.Vol.128.
Yus, Fransico (2006) Relevance Theory. In L. Mey(Eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, 854-861. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Yus, Fransico (2009.) Relevance Theory. In Heine-main-drv Heine-Narrog (Typeset by Spi, Chennai) 753 of 778..
Yus, Fransico (1997)A Decade of Relevance Theory. Journal of Pragmatics 30(3):305-345.
Yus, Fransico (2002) Humour and the Search for Relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (2003) 1295–1331.
Appendix: The Interview
(Access Date: 20/8/2022).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of University of Raparin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
