The Significance of Pragmatic Competence in English Language Teaching: Behdini Kurdish University Teachers’ Perspectives

المؤلفون

  • Saeed Ayyed Atiyah Department of English Language, College of Basic Education, University of Duhok, Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(12).%20No(2).Paper29

الملخص

Pragmatics concerns the indirect meaning that needs context and, sometimes, knowledge of the target language’s cultural norms to be interpreted. Thus, the present study sheds light on pragmatic competence and its importance in EFL classrooms from the point of view of Behdini Kurdish university teachers. Twenty-five teachers responded to the open-ended and agreement statements survey. The questions that the present study addressed were: whether Behdini Kurdish university teachers are familiar with pragmatics and speech acts or not and whether they agree that pragmatic competence needs to be implemented in the EFL curriculum or not. The data was analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively in terms of the content of the teachers’ responses to the open-ended questions, and also the numbers and percentages of the agreement statements. The results revealed that Behdini Kurdish university teachers are aware of pragmatics, speech acts, and eventually pragmatic competence. They also indicated that the teachers are familiar with the inappropriate topics that need to be avoided in cross-cultural settings. Finally, the study recommends that pragmatic competence should be implemented and tested in EFL classrooms, and teachers can help their students develop their pragmatic awareness in the target language. 

المراجع

Achiba, M. (2003). Learning to request in a second language: Child interlanguage pragmatics. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK.

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (Vol. 1955). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bach, K. (2006). Speech acts and pragmatics. In M. Devitt, & R. Hanley (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of language. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 147- 167.

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence of the need for instruction in pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching, (pp. 13- 32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Barron, A., & Warga, M. (2007). Acquisitional pragmatics: Focus on foreign language learners.

Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T. & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R., C. Scarcella, E. S. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language, (pp. 55-73). New York: Newbury House Publishers.

Bialystok, E. (1993). Symbolic representation and attentional control in pragmatic competence. In G. Kasper, & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage Pragmatics, (pp. 43- 57). New York: Oxford University Press.

Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. London: Sage Publications.

Crystal, D. (1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. 4th edition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Griffiths, P. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics.

Huang, Y. (2012). The Oxford dictionary of pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ivanova, I. N. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of the role of pragmatics in the EFL classroom. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 3(1), 27-44.‏

Lakoff, R. (1990). Talking power: The politics of language in our lives. Scranton. Glasgow: HarperCollins.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/ complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18/2, 141-165.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.

Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in Second Language Pragmatics. System, 33, 385-399.

Rose, K., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper, & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage Pragmatics, (pp. 21-42). New York: Oxford University Press.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press.

Tilbury, A., Clementson, T., Hendra, L. A., & Rea, D. (2013). English Unlimited. A2 elementary coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

منشور

2025-04-29

إصدار

القسم

Humanities & Social Sciences

كيفية الاقتباس

The Significance of Pragmatic Competence in English Language Teaching: Behdini Kurdish University Teachers’ Perspectives. (2025). Journal of University of Raparin, 12(2), 630-650. https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(12). No(2).Paper29