An Evaluation of the Materials Deployed in English Language Proficiency Courses for Postgraduate Applicants: A Content- Based Study

Authors

  • Bekhal Latif Muhedeen Department of English, College of Languages, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(9).No(4).Paper14

Keywords:

Material Evaluation, Interchange 3, Content analysis, Teachers’ Perceptions.

Abstract

             There is broad recognition that a textbook, among other components, plays an important role in many English language classrooms today. As a result, its evaluation is a significant issue to guarantee its contribution to the success of the teaching- learning process. Evaluating textbooks and other instructional materials used in the teaching- learning contexts is one of the responsibilities of teachers. The textbooks adopted in Kurdistan university language centers are no exception. Hence, the present paper is an attempt to conduct a post-use evaluation for the content of one of the textbooks (Interchange 3) used at the intermediate level in Kurdistan university English language proficiency courses. It aims to determine the areas of strengths and weaknesses of the textbook content and to see to what extent it was appropriate in helping the learners improve their level of English from the teachers’ perspectives. The textbook is analyzed using a descriptive content analysis method. For this purpose, 23 teachers who taught this textbook in six different language centers were asked to participate and the data were obtained through a 24-item questionnaire suggested by Demir and Ertaș (2014). The results of the content analysis indicated that the teachers are highly satisfied with the textbook under evaluation regardless of some deficiencies in certain aspects of the textbook - and that the textbook suited the teaching/ learning context as it could provide sufficient meaningful opportunities for the learners to communicate with the target language.

References

Allwright, R. L. (1981). ‘What do we want teaching materials for?’ ELT Journal.36 (1), 5-17.

Al-Masri, N. (1993). Developing learning materials for Palestinian learners of English in Gaza strip. Unpublished PhD Thesis. UK: University of Manchester.

Azarnoosh, M., Zeraatpishe M. & Khosrojerdi, M. (2018). Evaluation of ESP textbooks, In Azarnoosh, M., Zeraatpishe, M., Faravani, A., & Kargozari, H. R., (Eds.), Issues in coursebook evaluation. Leiden: Brill.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.

Demir, Y. & Ertaş, A. (2014). ‘A suggested eclectic checklist for ELT coursebook evaluation’. The Reading Matrix. 14 (2), 243- 252.

Dominguez, L. M. (2003). Gender textbook evaluation. UK: Centre for English Language Studies.

Ellis, R. (1997). ‘The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials’. ELT Journal. 51, (1), 36-42.

Genesee P. & Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Haji, L. S. (2020). Investigating the impact of multimedia- aided coherence teaching on the quality of EFL writing in Sulaymaniyah city. Unpublished MA Thesis. Sulaimani: University of Sulaimani.

Hutchinson, T. & Torres, E. (1994). ‘The textbook as agent of change’. ELT Journal, 48 (4), 315-328.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications.

McDonough, J. & Shaw, C. (1998). Evaluating ELT materials. in Crystal, D. & Jonson, K. (eds.). Materials and Methods in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Nguyen, N., Tran, V. T., Bui, L. P. & Nguyen, H. A. (2018). ‘Evaluating the benefits and values of textbooks: perceptions of Vietnamese business students’. Springer, 34 (1), 378- 384.

O’Neill, R. (1982). ‘Why use textbooks?’ ELT Journal. 36 (2), 104-111.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C, Hull, J. & Proctor, S. (2017). Interchange 3, (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sahragard, R., Zaremoayeddi, I. & Rahimi, A. (2009). ‘An in-depth evaluation of Interchange series’. Porta Linguarum, 12 (3), 37-54.

Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Şendoğan, K. (2019). ‘Turkish EFL learners’ perspectives on Interchange series’. Journal of Philology and Translation Studies, 1 (1), 60-69.

Sheldon, L. (1988). ‘Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials’. ELT Journal, 42 (4), 237–246.

Tayyebi, G., Farzanefar, H. & Ilun, M. (2014). ‘Interchange vs. Top- Notch: A comparative study’. International Journal of Modern Management & Foresight, 1 (5), 156-164.

Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum Press.

Ur, P. (1991). A course in language teaching: practice and theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zohrabi, M., Sabouri, H. & Kheradmand, M. (2014). ‘A comparative study of Interchange 1 and English Book 1 of Iranian high schools’, International Journal of English and Education, 3 (2), 95- 104.

Zohrabi, M. (2011). ‘Coursebook development and evaluation for English for general purposes course’. English Language Teaching, 4 (2), 213-222.

Cunningsworth A. (1995). Choosing Your Course book.

Oxford: Heinemann.

Published

2022-09-29

How to Cite

Muhedeen, B. L. . (2022). An Evaluation of the Materials Deployed in English Language Proficiency Courses for Postgraduate Applicants: A Content- Based Study. Journal of University of Raparin, 9(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(9).No(4).Paper14

Issue

Section

Humanities & Social Sciences