Violence as a Coercive Tool to Establish State Control in Harold Pinter’s One for the Road
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(11).No(4).Paper22Keywords:
Pinter, One for The Road, Violence, State Control, Galtung.Abstract
After Harold Pinter became a member of PEN and Amnesty International in the early 1980s, he grew interested in global politics and started to openly speak up against human rights violations present in several countries of the world. Then, in 1984, he published One for the Road, which is considered his first overtly political play. Taking place in an unnamed country and historical period to preserve its universality, the play portrays the torture and violence practised by totalitarian regimes against political dissidents. This study examines the use of various forms of violence in the text and analyses their role as the means to establish state control over nonconforming individuals, break their will and coerce them into submission. For this purpose, a socio-political approach is used by employing the Norwegian sociologist Johan Galtung’s theory on violence. The detailed analysis of the play reveals that tyrannical systems dehumanise and debase noncomplying citizens using political ideology as an excuse so that imprisoning and torturing them becomes justifiable.
References
Alhasan, G. 2017, 'Ethics, politics, and alterity in selected plays and other works by Harold Pinter', PhD thesis, Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/195
Amnesty International (2023). Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/ (Accessed: March 28, 2023).
Bufacchi, V. (2005) ‘Two concepts of violence’, Political Studies Review, 3(2), pp. 193–204. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2005.00023.x. (Accessed: 12 December 2022)
Burkman, K.H. (1971) The Dramatic World of Harold Pinter: Its basis in ritual. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Chiasson, E.B.A. 2010, ‘Harold Pinter and the performance of power: considerations of effect in select plays, screenplays and films, poetry and political speeches’, PhD thesis, The University of Leeds. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/4620/1/uk_bl_ethos_535104.pdf.
Cuddon, J.A. et al. (eds) (2013) ‘Comedy of Menace’, in Dictionary of literary terms and literary theory. 5th edn. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Dukore, B.F. (1988) Harold Pinter. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
Galtung, J. (1990) ‘Cultural Violence’, Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), pp. 291–305. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/423472. (Accessed: 28 November 2022).
Galtung, J. (1969) ‘Violence, Peace, and Peace Research’, Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), pp. 167–91. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/422690. (Accessed: 28 November 2022).
Goodspeed, A. (2019) ‘“I Am Not Alone”: Pinter, State Torture, and One for the Road’, Sjani, 1(20), pp. 48-55. Available at: http://sjani.ge/sjani-20/goodspidendr.pdf (Accessed: 22 December 2022)
Gregory, S. (1996) ‘Ariel Dorfman and Harold Pinter: Politics of the Periphery and Theater of the Metropolis’, Comparative Drama, 30(3), pp. 325–45. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41153815. (Accessed: 18 December 2022).
Grimes, C. (2005) Harold Pinter's politics: A silence beyond echo. Madison, WI: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Gussow, M. (1996) Conversations with Pinter. New York: Grove Press.
Inan, D. 2000, ‘The City and Landscapes beyond Harold Pinter's Rooms’, PhD thesis, University of Warwick. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b1369194~S15
Luckhurst, M. (2006) A companion to Modern British and Irish drama: 1880-2005. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Owens, C. N. (2017) ‘Time Out of Joint: Power, Performance, and the State of Exception in Harold Pinter's Drama’, The Harold Pinter Review, 1(1), pp. 29–49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5325/haropintrevi.1.1.0029. (Accessed: 20 December 2022)
PEN International (2022). What is PEN International? Available at: https://www.pen-international.org/faqs (Accessed: March 28, 2023).
Pinter, H. (1985) One for the Road. New York: Grove Weidenfeld.
Pinter, H. (2006) “One for the Road,” in Harold Pinter: Plays 4. 2nd edn. Faber & Faber, pp. 221–247.
Quigley, A. (2009) ‘Pinter, Politics and Postmodernism (1)’, in Raby, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Harold Pinter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–26.
Shammout, H. 2018, ‘Politics, Oppression and Violence in Harold Pinter’s Plays through the Lens of Arabic Plays from Egypt and Syria’, PhD thesis, University of Birmingham. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/8221.
Silverstein, M. (1991) ‘One for the Road, Mountain Language and the Impasse of Politics’, Modern Drama, 34(3), pp. 422–440. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3138/md.34.3.422. (Accessed: 18 December 2022)
Tavares, R. (2011) “Peace Theory”, in Kurian G. T. et al. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Political Science, vol. 1-5. Washington DC: CQ Press.
Tavassoli, S. (2016) ‘Pinter’s Political Theatre: A Quest for Socio-Political Spaces of Authority in One for The Road and Party Time’, International Journal of English and Literature (IJEL), 6(3), pp. 53–60. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2838198. (Accessed: 30 November 2022).
Visser, D. (1996) ‘Communicating Torture. The Dramatic Language of Harold Pinter’, Neophilologus, 80(2), pp. 327–340. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00212110. (Accessed: 12 December 2022)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of University of Raparin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
