Mass Control and The Abuse of Technology in Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451.

Authors

  • Brwa Ridha Ahmed English department, College of Language and Education, Charmo University, Chamchamal, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Zanyar Kareem Abdul English department, College of Language and Education, Charmo University- Chamchamal, Kurdistan Region- Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(10).No(3).Paper16

Keywords:

Dystopia, The Abuse of Technology, Totalitarianism.

Abstract

This article shows a kind of dystopian culture that controls citizens differently. Fahrenheit 451 is a genre which is possible to research and analyze; particularly the author attempts to ridicule society while simultaneously serving as a warning to the audience by illustrating what may happen to the world. It portrays an image of a totalitarian dystopia. Also, this novel was written by an author who was famous in the world and had a noble prize. On the other way, the abuse of technology is the other main issue in this paper, which is used for controlling people and spying on them.

References

theJohnmeroney, August 15 2021. "Read Ray Bradbury before he’s canceled". https spectatorworld://.com/topic/read-ray-bradbury-before-canceled-dystopian, Retrieved from https://twitter.com.

Abass, Salim Kadhim, and S. C. Sandaran, 2019. "Beyond the Ideological Siege: A Critical Reading of Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451." International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-8 Issue-5C, India.

Arendt, H. Totalitarianism, 1951. 1st ed. Cleveland and New York: Schocken Books, , pp.311-315.

Anwar, M., 2016. Postmodern Dystopian Fiction: An Analysis of Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451. International Journal of Language and Literature, 4, pp.246-249.

Bloom, Harold, 2007. Bloom’s Guides; Fahrenheit 451. New York: Infobase Publishing.

Bloom, Harold, 2008. Bloom’s modern critical interpretations: Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451. Infobase Publishing, New York.

Bressler, C.E., 2011. In Literary criticism: An introduction to theory and Practice. Boston: Pearson Longman.

Bills, Mathew, 2013. A Marxist Criticism of Fahrenheit 451. DJALogical.

Bradbury, Ray, 2013. "A Marxist Criticism of Fahrenheit 451.", Atar Notes submission: DJALogical.

…………..1989. Fahrenheit 451. Gallimard.

…………..2012, Fahrenheit 451: A Novel. Simon and Schuster.

Fatma, S.M.A.T.T.I., 2021. Ideological Repression and Rebellion in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451. University of Biskra, Master thesis.

Foucault, Michel, 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, ed. C. Gordon, Pantheon Books, New York.

Foucault, Michel,1990. The History of Sexuality, vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.

Foucault, Michel, 1977. Discipline and Punish, trans. A. Sheridan, New York, Pantheon.

Foucault, Michel, 1997. Discipline and Punish: Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York.

Marx, T., 1906. In Über ammoniakalische Chromrhodanverbindungen. Zürich.

Marx, K., Engels, F., 1976. In The German ideology. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

McGlinn, Jeanne M, 2012. Teacher's Guide to Ray Bradbury Fahrenheit 451. Simon & Schuster, Routlege.

Mourelle Facal, Miguel, 2020. "The process and modes of control in dystopian literature: an analysis of 1984 and Fahrenheit 451.".

Mohammadi, Ali, 2019. "State’s Abuse of Technology and Its CataclysmicRepercussions in Society: A Critical Scrutiny of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451." International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Istanbul, Yeni Yuzyil university.

Negri, A., 2006. Foucault between past and future. Ephemera: Theory of the Multitude, 6(1), pp.75-82.

Vinski, petra, 2017. " Censorship in Contemporary American Novels: The Handmaid’s Tale and Fahrenheit 451". Language and Literature at the University of Rijeka. Diss. University of Rijeka. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Department of English Language and Literature.

Published

2023-09-29

How to Cite

Ahmed, B. R. ., & Abdul, Z. K. . (2023). Mass Control and The Abuse of Technology in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451. Journal of University of Raparin, 10(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(10).No(3).Paper16

Issue

Section

Humanities & Social Sciences